Syntronik Feature Requests

Hammond B-3X, Syntronik, Syntronik Deluxe, SampleTank, Miroslav Philharmonik 2, SampleTron 2, and all Powered by SampleTank instruments and sounds for Mac/PC

Syntronik Feature Requests

Postby Teksonik » Tue Jul 25, 2017 3:02 am

[ Mod Edit: Read through the list to make sure that yours are new, before you add them. ]

Post your feature requests for Syntronik here. I'll post a few of mine..... :)

1. A Mod Matrix which will allow for modulating more elements like ADSR etc.

2. A Global Effects Page and a Global Mixer Page.

3. Lock Effects, Lock Arp, and Lock Synth Edits options which will allow for browsing samples without losing any edits.

4. Not really related to Syntronik itself but the sample content. A drum machine module (808?) would allow us to use the Arp/Seqs for creating rhythm tracks.

5. The Ability to Bypass certain Controllers for the Layers. (On/Off ModWheel, Aftertouch perhaps even Pitch Bend)

I'll think of more............. :mrgreen:
Last edited by DarkStar on Tue Jul 09, 2024 4:50 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Reason: just to unstick it
Teksonik
 
Posts: 60
Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2011 2:08 am

Re: Syntronik Feature Requests

Postby jdoolitt » Tue Jul 25, 2017 2:04 pm

6. Remove the [X] controls on the GUI, that delete Syntronik patches. Move this functionality into a menu item, so users don’t accidentally delete factory sounds.

7. Allow mapping of controls / functions to external expression pedals. E.G. Allow Filter Frequency ( or Resonance, or LFO Act, etc..) to be controlled by a foot expression pedal.

8. Adjunct to 7. . Allow mapping of keyboard controller aftertouch to Filter Frequency ( or Resonance, or LFO Act, etc.

9. Update the manuals on Multis / saving, editing, recalling. There is a way — but the manual is unclear
jdoolitt
 
Posts: 9
Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2012 5:07 am

Re: Syntronik Feature Requests

Postby carsten_brueck » Tue Jul 25, 2017 3:26 pm

10 pitch envelope would be cool (is really missing.. Some oldschool sounds are not possible, like the dominator or bass patches with slightly pitched attack.. Please just do another layer under the filter envelope ) :mrgreen:

11 parameter link when working with different layers..for example for the filter (for everything incl arp ..except the oscillator part.. this is a stab machine :D )

+ 1 for point 3 , especially "Lock Synth Edits"..extremely useful for T-03
Last edited by carsten_brueck on Wed Jul 26, 2017 8:19 pm, edited 3 times in total.
carsten_brueck
 
Posts: 15
Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2012 9:42 pm

Re: Syntronik Feature Requests

Postby DarkStar » Tue Jul 25, 2017 4:51 pm

12 make the scroll bar in Settings / Program Change clearer,.
13 add the ability to change order of FX (by dragging?).
14 in the Layer view, drag the top or bottom edge of the big orange zone to set the Low and High Velocities (not the small ladder on the right-hand side).
14a change the orange shading to reflect the low / high velocity limits.
15 in the Layer view, drag the left or right edge of the orange zone to set the Low and High Notes (not those two anchor points in the top corners).
16 always display the virtual keyboard, do not obscure the lower part of the GUI.
17 improve the quality of fonts used for the control labels and values.
18 make the control labels and values BIGGER.
19 in the '99' (and others?) make the Filter Type, Mode and Pole directly selectable by clicking, rather than having to click repeatedly on the labelled button.
20 Add a confirmation step to the Instrument 'Save' function to avoid overwriting a Factory instrument accidentally.
21 separate outputs for each Part
22 User Manual: add descriptions of each control in each FX.
23 User Manual: fix the typos
Last edited by DarkStar on Tue Jul 25, 2017 9:44 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: clarify 14 & 15, add 14a
----------------
DarkStar ... interesting, if true.
Inspired by ...
User avatar
DarkStar
Hero Of The Week (Moderator)
 
Posts: 8765
Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2010 5:42 pm
Location: Surrey, UK

Re: Syntronik Feature Requests

Postby carsten_brueck » Tue Jul 25, 2017 5:45 pm

24 transpose the incoming MIDI Signal +/- Octave in the layers
25 Audio Input and fx vst ;-P
carsten_brueck
 
Posts: 15
Joined: Tue Mar 20, 2012 9:42 pm

Re: Syntronik Feature Requests

Postby Teksonik » Tue Jul 25, 2017 6:23 pm

Is that all ? :mrgreen:

All great suggestions !

I don't think I've seen this yet:

26. Full Browser for Multis just like the Instruments Browser

In general more focus on the Layers capability. In my opinion that's where the real power of Syntronik lies........ :)
Teksonik
 
Posts: 60
Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2011 2:08 am

Re: Syntronik Feature Requests

Postby cmr454 » Tue Jul 25, 2017 9:00 pm

27. The Effects drop down should not cover the synth.
28. There should be a Global kill for the Effects.
29. The steps to get back to the synth HUD should be streamlined.
Last edited by DarkStar on Tue Jul 25, 2017 9:19 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Reason: sequential numbering of requests
cmr454
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2013 1:26 am

Re: Syntronik Feature Requests

Postby DarkStar » Wed Jul 26, 2017 1:12 pm

30 128 user-mappable automation parameters (a la K****kt)
----------------
DarkStar ... interesting, if true.
Inspired by ...
User avatar
DarkStar
Hero Of The Week (Moderator)
 
Posts: 8765
Joined: Fri Dec 17, 2010 5:42 pm
Location: Surrey, UK

Re: Syntronik Feature Requests

Postby masterst » Thu Jul 27, 2017 10:30 am

31. How about sample some Korgs. Korg expansion.
32. The Ensemble effect become a separate VST or T-racks. It rocks. Many synth lovers will buy it.
33. Ability to save the effect chain. (all 5 effects as 1 preset)
masterst
 
Posts: 8
Joined: Sat Aug 31, 2013 12:24 am

Re: Syntronik Feature Requests

Postby jdoolitt » Thu Jul 27, 2017 2:02 pm

34. Ability to create/edit effects at a “Master” level.. and allow each of the four parts to mix into the “Master” effects before going outbound. Don’t remove part effects, but add a Master Effects capablity. DUPE to #2, it appears. Sorry for this one.
35. Option to split output of the four parts into separate MIDI instrument tracks in the DAW outbound interface, instead of being mixed into a single channel. Yes, this can be done with multiple instances of Syntronik - but its inefficient. May be a dupe to #21? But looking for the ability to see multiple channels from a single instance, in Logic Pro.
jdoolitt
 
Posts: 9
Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2012 5:07 am

Re: Syntronik Feature Requests

Postby SuperKons » Thu Jul 27, 2017 10:40 pm

jdoolitt wrote:34. Ability to create/edit effects at a “Master” level.. and allow each of the four parts to mix into the “Master” effects before going outbound. Don’t remove part effects, but add a Master Effects capablity. DUPE to #2, it appears. Sorry for this one.
35. Option to split output of the four parts into separate MIDI instrument tracks in the DAW outbound interface, instead of being mixed into a single channel. Yes, this can be done with multiple instances of Syntronik - but its inefficient. May be a dupe to #21? But looking for the ability to see multiple channels from a single instance, in Logic Pro.

For 35, I would use Sample Tank 3 in a DAW, as it would have all the different instruments individually separated, and, therefore, also giving the ability to "layer" more than 4
SuperKons
 
Posts: 52
Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 1:26 am

Re: Syntronik Feature Requests

Postby zzz00m » Thu Jul 27, 2017 11:47 pm

36. How about adding an oscillator sample selector to Oscillator #1 & 2? If the whole library of samples was available to audition from within each instrument preset, it would be cool to mix samples from various synths while working within a selected instrument.

Say you had a Minimod preset open, and you wanted to try an OXa sound in it, without opening up an OXa instrument preset first.
zzz00m
 
Posts: 71
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2016 6:23 pm

Re: Syntronik Feature Requests

Postby orbitoverluna » Fri Jul 28, 2017 4:28 am

37. NKS support? I know Syntronik can be opened within Komplete Kontrol, but it would be great to have the controls officialy mapped to the hardware knobs
orbitoverluna
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 8:53 pm

Re: Syntronik Feature Requests

Postby Teksonik » Fri Jul 28, 2017 5:46 pm

Would it be better to start a new thread about what Instrument Expansions we would like to see released in the future and keep this thread for feature requests for the plugin itself ?

Out of curiosity is anyone from the Development Team reading this thread ? :)
Teksonik
 
Posts: 60
Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2011 2:08 am

Re: Syntronik Feature Requests

Postby Peter_IK » Fri Jul 28, 2017 6:39 pm

Teksonik wrote:Out of curiosity is anyone from the Development Team reading this thread ? :)

Yes, and the requests are getting relayed too so the whole team can see them.
IK Multimedia. Musicians First.
YouTube - Facebook - Twitter
Need help? Our support team will be happy to help and can be reached at this link.
From the rules: Moderator decisions are not a matter for forum discussion and are final.
User avatar
Peter_IK
Kingpin
 
Posts: 20387
Joined: Thu Nov 18, 2010 3:40 pm
Location: Everywhere

Next

Return to Virtual Instruments: SampleTank, Hammond B-3X, More