Official Arc System Wish List!

IK Product Manager, Lurssen Mastering Console, CSR (Classik Studio Reverb), and acoustic correction system ARC (Advanced Room Correction) System

Re: Official Arc System Wish List!

Postby Peter_IK » Sun Mar 24, 2024 9:43 pm

CMSE wrote:The ARC Studio is great and with "Phase" set to "Natural" the latency is negligible. But in my studio the "Linear" setting sounds much better, but then the latency is long making it useless for tracking and when trying out mic positions.

How about a bigger version with a more powerful DSP, so we don't have to change the Phase setting back and fourth when tracking and mixing, so we can set and forget it?

Using any linear phase tool will introduce latency at the expense of quality. Normally folks are only mixing or mastering with such tools and during tracking there are minimal plugins that use resource-heavy functionality like linear phase (usually none) used.

However, of course your suggestion/request will be relayed. Thank you.
IK Multimedia. Musicians First.
YouTube - Facebook - Twitter
Need help? Our support team will be happy to help and can be reached at this link.
From the rules: Moderator decisions are not a matter for forum discussion and are final.
User avatar
Peter_IK
Kingpin
 
Posts: 20210
Joined: Thu Nov 18, 2010 3:40 pm
Location: Everywhere

Re: Official Arc System Wish List!

Postby CMSE » Sun Mar 24, 2024 10:05 pm

Peter_IK wrote:
CMSE wrote:The ARC Studio is great and with "Phase" set to "Natural" the latency is negligible. But in my studio the "Linear" setting sounds much better, but then the latency is long making it useless for tracking and when trying out mic positions.

How about a bigger version with a more powerful DSP, so we don't have to change the Phase setting back and fourth when tracking and mixing, so we can set and forget it?

Using any linear phase tool will introduce latency at the expense of quality. Normally folks are only mixing or mastering with such tools and during tracking there are minimal plugins that use resource-heavy functionality like linear phase (usually none) used.

However, of course your suggestion/request will be relayed. Thank you.


I perfectly understand why a longer latency is introduced when using a more processor hungry audio process and the only way to deal with that problem is to upgrade the DSP, which of course comes with a premium and considering the price of the ARC Studio that amount of DSP power won't fit the budget, hence the suggestion for a ARC Studio Pro a more expensive version with more DSP power and negligible latency when setting "Phase" to "Linear".

ARC Studio is a great product, this is just some constructive feedback to make a better more expensive version in addition to the current ARC Studio.
User avatar
CMSE
 
Posts: 4
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2011 1:17 pm

Make the Studio 'signal' blinking on/off optional please

Postby nikolai » Tue May 07, 2024 4:08 pm

Not exactly sure what the thinking is behind the signal part of the ARC Studio's signal/clip indicator blinking on/off when listening at workspace/conversation volumes, but having the box set up and accessible between desk/rack and monitor the blinking is pretty distracting. Or at late night work/listen levels no signal indicator at all...is it even doing anything at those levels?
Is there any way to implement optional full-time signal indicator that simply turns red for clipping or even just disable it and only have the red for clipping?
nikolai
 
Posts: 7
Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2023 2:51 pm

Re: Official Arc System Wish List!

Postby acdc2000 » Tue May 28, 2024 12:37 pm

arc 4 is best in broad mode for my room. but it have a large high q gap then in some frequencies. so arc should be allow the EQ in edit mode with higher q to boost this gap until it sound best. or maybe do more correction types to choose between broad and default.
acdc2000
 
Posts: 41
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2013 2:01 pm

Re: Official Arc System Wish List!

Postby acdc2000 » Thu May 30, 2024 11:57 am

it is also usefull to be able to correct in bass range left and right independent because it happen that on low bass in my room a 78 hz sine tone sound as it come from more left and is not clear locatable(in compare with arc disable).in songs it help to get better sound to reduce stereo width in this frequency. so to get better speaker correction it is also usefull to allow reduce stereo width in small muliband stereo imagine settings include in arc

i am maybe not the only but bass location errors on speakers cause same strange ear feeling as incorrectly polarizes speakers

the developers of arc should also compare the correctet results of speakers with a correctet heaphone when hear a kick drum in mono in a simple test drumloop. I always hear that kick drum sound much more diffrent and dull after correction as with the headphone in default or sharp mode.

I have a treated room and 6 large melamin foam basstraps.
acdc2000
 
Posts: 41
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2013 2:01 pm

Re: Official Arc System Wish List!

Postby matt.montag » Fri Jun 14, 2024 6:39 am

My unpopular opinion: I think room correction can be marketed to a larger hi-fi audience.
I don't want to bring up nightmares of the Onkyo Denon A/V receiver room correction, but I mean... that's the idea.

So my wish would be to make the ARC box more self-contained and user-friendly: with a microphone input. Or, let me hook the microphone up to my phone (like the USB UMIK) and calibrate with an app. Anything to avoid the requirement of an audio interface+laptop in the picture.

(confession: I bought an audio interface with the ARC 4 because I didn't have any XLR inputs)
matt.montag
 
Posts: 3
Joined: Fri Jun 14, 2024 5:05 am

Re: Official Arc System Wish List!

Postby acdc2000 » Wed Sep 04, 2024 5:11 pm

I get in arc 4 lots of hearable prering on kick drum and I think arc 4 can be much better when there is a additional mode that correct left and right speaker with same eq settings in minimum mode. Only the diffrences from left to right channel should be correct with linear phase mode. this avoid prering which sound very bad on kick drums and transients when all is correct on linear phase mode.

because when use diffrent eq settings on left and right channels the phase shifts of the minimal eq setting create due to phase shift between left and right channel strange stereo image in bass range but good transients
acdc2000
 
Posts: 41
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2013 2:01 pm

Previous

Return to Other Music Production Software & Tools